NACBA has filed an amicus brief arguing that the Eighth Circuit Court of Appeals should find that a debt collector that files a proof of claim for a time-barred debt is subject to suit under the FDCPA. Nelson v. Midland Credit Management, No. 15-2984 (8th Cir.) (filed January 25, 2016). The brief seeks reversal of the district court’s finding that filing a proof of claim for a time-barred debt does not violate the FDCPA. [Read more…] about NACBA Weighs in on FDCPA Claims for Time-Barred Debts
Loan Servicer Lack of Good Faith in Loss Mitigation Program
Failure to tell the debtor that a down payment toward mortgage arrears was essential to loan modification rendered the loan servicer’s loss mitigation negotiations in bad faith. Rushmore Loan Management Services v. Hosking, No. 15-3999 (S.D. N.Y. Jan. 11, 2016). [Read more…] about Loan Servicer Lack of Good Faith in Loss Mitigation Program
Court Permits Strip-off of Lien for Delinquent HOA Assessments
A condominium lien which is wholly unsecured under section 506(a) by virtue of a first mortgage may be treated as unsecured in the chapter 13 plan and may be avoided through the mechanism of either a valuation hearing under Fed. R. Bankr. P. 3012 or through a stand-alone adversary proceeding. The court rejected the condo association’s attempt to benefit from the state’s “super lien” law in light of the fact that no judicial sale of the property had taken place. Sligh v. Northpoint I Condominium Assoc., No. 14-14544, Adv. Pro. No. 15-56 (Bankr. E.D. Pa. Dec. 3, 2015). [Read more…] about Court Permits Strip-off of Lien for Delinquent HOA Assessments
9th Circuit BAP Discusses Late-Filed Return Dischargeability
The Bankruptcy Appellate Panel for the Ninth Circuit found that the bankruptcy court erred by failing to follow Ninth Circuit precedent when it held that a late-filed tax return is a “return” for purposes of dischargeability so long as it meets the objective test of proper form and substance. United States v. Martin, No. 14-1180 (B.A.P. 9th Cir. Dec. 17, 2015). [Read more…] about 9th Circuit BAP Discusses Late-Filed Return Dischargeability
Previously Discharged Personal Liability Does Not Count Toward Debt Limit
The unsecured debt limit circumscribing eligibility for chapter 13 bankruptcy does not include personal liability on wholly unsecured liens where that liability was discharged in a prior chapter 7 case. Free v. Maliaer (In re Free), No. 14-1395 (B.A.P. 9th Cir. Dec. 17, 2015). [Read more…] about Previously Discharged Personal Liability Does Not Count Toward Debt Limit
FDCPA Not Repealed by Bankruptcy Code
In good news to start off the New Year, the Second Circuit has found that the Bankruptcy Code does not preclude application of the FDCPA to a claim involving a debt discharged in bankruptcy. Garfield v. Ocwen Loan Servicing, No. 15-527 (2d Cir. Jan. 4, 2016). [Read more…] about FDCPA Not Repealed by Bankruptcy Code
Supreme Court Doubleheader
NACBA filed amicus briefs on Monday in two Supreme Court cases: Harris v. Viegelahn, 14-400, and Bullard v. Blue Hills Bank, 14-116.
Harris asks whether funds paid into a confirmed chapter 13 plan that are still in the trustee’s possession when the bankruptcy is converted to chapter 7 should be refunded to the debtor or paid to creditors. At the time of conversion, the trustee was holding funds originally designated for the debtor’s mortgagee, but more than $4,300 in funds were not disbursed because the mortgagee obtained relief from stay and foreclosed on the debtor’s home. Neither the trustee nor the debtor sought to modify the plan. Instead, the debtor converted the case to Chapter 7. Several days after debtor filed his notice of conversion, the trustee distributed the funds she had on hand to unsecured creditors. Harris moved to compel a refund of the money. The bankruptcy court granted the motion, and the district court affirmed. The Fifth Circuit reversed and found that the monies were properly distributed to creditors. Harris, No. 13-50374 (July 7, 2014) (disagreeing with In re Michael, 699 F.3d 305 (3rd Cir. 2012)).
NACBA’s brief in Harris argues that the Code’s plain text as well as the policies that animate the Code require that undisbursed funds be returned to the debtor.
Bullard asks whether denial of confirmation is a final appealable order. In Bullard, confirmation of the plan depended solely on the resolution of a disputed legal issue that has divided the bankruptcy courts. The bankruptcy court denied confirmation of debtor’s proposed plan, and after granting leave to appeal, the bankruptcy appellate panel affirmed. The First Circuit held that because the debtor could theoretically, though not realistically, submit a new plan, the decision of the bankruptcy appellate panel was not final. By contrast, if the bankruptcy appellate panel had ruled in the debtor’s favor and reversed the bankruptcy court, then its order would indisputably be final, and the First Circuit could conclusively determine the issue and resolve the split among the lower courts.
NACBA’s brief in Bullard argues that giving creditors, but not debtors, the ability to appeal decisions relating to plan confirmation is unjustified, that the alternatives proposed by the court—dismissal or refile and object to debtor’s plan—are problematic, and that allowing such appeals is unlikely to overburden the courts.
Bullard Amicus Brief of Bank of America
Pre-Bankruptcy Agreement Not To Discharge Debt Unenforceable
A debtor’s agreement prior to filing bankruptcy not to discharge her debt for attorney’s fees was found to be unenforceable under section 523(a)(2) and for public policy reasons. Ziegler v. Kline (In re Kline), No. 14-12815, Adv. Proc. No. 14-227 (Bankr. E.D. Pa. Nov. 20, 2014). [Read more…] about Pre-Bankruptcy Agreement Not To Discharge Debt Unenforceable
Default Interest Rate Inequitable
The lender’s default interest rate was inequitable under both sections 502(b) and 506(b) where, among other factors, the lender was oversecured, ran no realistic risk of loss, and was more financially sophisticated than the debtors. In re Parker, No. 12-03128 (Bankr. E.D. N.C. Nov. 19, 2014). [Read more…] about Default Interest Rate Inequitable
En Banc Rehearing Granted on Sternberg Issue
The Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals has granted America’s Servicing Company’s petition for rehearing en banc in In re Schwartz-Tallard, No. 12-60052 (Petition granted, Dec. 19, 2014). The case arose out of the debtor’s motion for attorney fees relating to ASC’s appeal of a finding that it had violated the automatic stay. The Ninth Circuit found that the debtor’s attorney fees were actual damages under section 362(k)(1). In re Schwartz-Tallard, 765 F.3d 1096 (9th Cir. August 29, 2014), aff’g, In re Schwartz-Tallard, 473 B.R. 340 (B.A.P. 9th Cir. 2012). The court distinguished Sternberg v. Johnston, 595 F.3d 937 (9th Cir. 2010), which held that a debtor’s attorneys’ fees for work on an adversary proceeding seeking damages for a stay violation were not actual damages and thus were not recoverable under 11 U.S.C. § 362(k)(1). In this case, ASC’s appeal challenged both the fee award and the substantive stay violation ruling, therefore, the debtor’s fees were incurred in defending both the damage award and the finding of stay violation.
Oral argument is scheduled for the week of March 16, 2015, though debtor’s counsel has asked for a new date.