Type: Amicus
Date: December 11, 2014
Description: Whether debtor may categorically exclude child support from calculation of disposable income.
Result: Affirmed April 23, 2015
-
Clark v. Brooks (In re Brooks) No. 14-2856 (7th Cir.)
Posted by NCBRC - May 12th, 2015
-
In re Wolf, No. 14-1346 (4th Cir.)
Posted by NCBRC - September 30th, 2014
Type: Amicus
Date: August 4, 2014
Description: Whether above-median debtor’s projected disposable income should be calculated from the statutory formula rather than schedules I and J.
Results: Judgment affirmed November 6, 2014 (debtor won) -
Drummond v. Welsh, No. 12-60009 (9th Cir.)
Posted by NCBRC - November 26th, 2012
Type: Amicus brief
Date: October 11, 2012
Description: Whether social security income is included in “projected disposable income.”
Result: Judgment affirmed March 25, 2013 – debtor won -
In re Mort Ranta, No. 12-2017 (4th Cir.)
Posted by NCBRC - October 17th, 2012
Type: Amicus
Date: October 16, 2012
Description: Whether social security income is included in projected disposable income.
Result: Vacated and remanded, July 1, 2013 -
Anderson v. Cranmer, No. 12-4002 (10th Cir.)
Posted by NCBRC - June 18th, 2012
Type: Amicus
Date: June 12, 2012
Description: Whether social security income should be excluded from calculation of projected disposable income.
Result: Judgment affirmed, October 24, 2012 -
Washington v. Reding, No. 09-0579 (M.D. Ala.)
Posted by NCBRC - September 4th, 2011
Type: Amicus
Date: October 29, 2009
Description: Whether unemployment compensation is excluded from CMI as social security benefit.
Result: Affirmed. Debtor lost. -
In re Kagenveama, No. 06-17083 (9th Cir.)
Posted by NCBRC - September 3rd, 2011
Type: Amicus
Date: June 14, 2007
Description: Forward looking vs Mechanical approach to projected disposable income and applicable commitment period.
Result: Affirmed. Debtor won.
Kagenveama 9th Cir opinion -
In re Frederickson, No. 07-3391 (8th Cir.)
Posted by NCBRC - September 3rd, 2011
Type: Amicus
Date: January 8, 2008
Description: Whether applicable commitment period is multiplier or temporal requirement and whether disposable income is projected using schedules I and J.
Result: Reversed. Supreme Court petition denied March 23, 2009.
Frederickson 8th Cir opinion -
In re Scott, No. 10-33131 (Bankr. S.D. Ill.).
Posted by NCBRC - September 2nd, 2011
Type: Amicus
Date: May 6, 2011
Description: Whether debtor who makes payments on secured vehicle may deduct full Ownership Costs as set forth in the IRS Local Standards when calculating PDI.
Result: Debtor won. -
In re Anes, No. 99-7043 (3d Cir.)
Posted by NCBRC - September 2nd, 2011
-
Request Assistance
Request assistance with a case.
-
Help NCBRC
NCBRC needs your support to protect the rights of consumer bankruptcy debtors. The most effective way to support NCBRC is with a direct donation.
There are many other ways to give to NRBRC:
iGive.com: When you purchase items at over 1,400 online stores, a percentage of your purchase will be donated to NCBRC. Stores include Macy’s, Melissa and Doug, Bed Bath & Beyond, Nike, Petsmart, and more. Shop and Give today!
-
Keep up with NCBRC
Thank you!
Thank you to the following organizations without whose support our work would not be possible.
American College of Bankruptcy
The American College of Bankruptcy is an honorary public service association of bankruptcy and insolvency professionals who are invited to join as Fellows based on a proven record of the highest standards of professionalism plus service to the profession and their communities. Together with its affiliated Foundation, the College is the largest financial supporter of bankruptcy and insolvency-related pro bono legal service programs in the United States.NACBA
Visit NACBA.org
The only national organization dedicated to serving the needs of consumer bankruptcy attorneys and protecting the rights of consumer debtors in bankruptcy. Formed in 1992, NACBA has more than 3,000 members located in all 50 states and Puerto Rico.