Wells Fargo lacked standing to assert a claim pursuant to a Note secured by a Deed of Trust, where a forged indorsement in blank did not give it “holder” status under applicable Texas law. In re Franklin, No. 10‐20010 (Bankr. S.D. N.Y. Jan. 29, 2015). [Read more…] about Court Turns Jaundiced Eye on Wells Fargo Robo-Mischief
NACBA Weighs in on Sternberg Issue
The NACBA membership has filed an amicus brief in the Ninth Circuit case of America’s Servicing Co. v. Schwartz-Tallard (In re Schwartz-Tallard), No. 12-60052 (filed Jan. 23, 2015). The brief seeks reconsideration of that court’s 2010 decision in Sternberg v. Johnston, 595 F.3d 937 which limited the right to recover attorney fees to those incurred in the effort to terminate a stay violation, but not to the fees incurred prosecuting section 362(k) damage claims. [Read more…] about NACBA Weighs in on Sternberg Issue
Creditor’s Failure to Comply with Rule 3002.1(g) Is Basis for Violation of State Consumer Law
The district court denied PNC’s motion to dismiss the borrowers’ complaint for violations of California consumer protection laws and common law claims based on PNC’s foreclosure action after plaintiffs successfully completed their chapter 13 plan. Sokoloski v. PNC Mortgage, No. 14-1374, 2014 WL 6473810 (E.D. Cal. Nov. 18, 2014). [Read more…] about Creditor’s Failure to Comply with Rule 3002.1(g) Is Basis for Violation of State Consumer Law
TILA Rescission Effective upon Notification
In a unanimous decision delivered by Justice Scalia, the Supreme Court held that so long as the borrower notifies the lender within three years of the transaction, his rescission is timely. Jesinoski v. Countrywide Homes, 574 U. S. ____ (2015), No. 13-684 (Jan. 13). [Read more…] about TILA Rescission Effective upon Notification
It’s Alive! – McCoy Adopted by Tenth Circuit
The Tenth Circuit has concluded that late-filed tax returns are not “returns” for dischargeability purposes unless filed by the IRS in cooperation with the debtor. Mallo v. IRS (In re Mallo), __ F.3d __, 2014 WL 7360130 (Dec. 29, 2014) (consolidated with In re Martin, 14-1488). [Read more…] about It’s Alive! – McCoy Adopted by Tenth Circuit
Sixth Circuit Reverses Denial of Amendment to Exemptions
The Sixth Circuit found that prejudice to creditors was unlikely to be a legitimate basis for denying a debtor’s motion to amend her schedules to increase her exemption claim, and that even if it were a legitimate basis, the trustee failed to show the existence of such prejudice. Westry v. Lim (In re Westry), No. 14-1440 (6th Cir. Dec. 30, 2014). [Read more…] about Sixth Circuit Reverses Denial of Amendment to Exemptions
Pre-Bankruptcy Agreement Not To Discharge Debt Unenforceable
A debtor’s agreement prior to filing bankruptcy not to discharge her debt for attorney’s fees was found to be unenforceable under section 523(a)(2) and for public policy reasons. Ziegler v. Kline (In re Kline), No. 14-12815, Adv. Proc. No. 14-227 (Bankr. E.D. Pa. Nov. 20, 2014). [Read more…] about Pre-Bankruptcy Agreement Not To Discharge Debt Unenforceable
Default Interest Rate Inequitable
The lender’s default interest rate was inequitable under both sections 502(b) and 506(b) where, among other factors, the lender was oversecured, ran no realistic risk of loss, and was more financially sophisticated than the debtors. In re Parker, No. 12-03128 (Bankr. E.D. N.C. Nov. 19, 2014). [Read more…] about Default Interest Rate Inequitable
En Banc Rehearing Granted on Sternberg Issue
The Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals has granted America’s Servicing Company’s petition for rehearing en banc in In re Schwartz-Tallard, No. 12-60052 (Petition granted, Dec. 19, 2014). The case arose out of the debtor’s motion for attorney fees relating to ASC’s appeal of a finding that it had violated the automatic stay. The Ninth Circuit found that the debtor’s attorney fees were actual damages under section 362(k)(1). In re Schwartz-Tallard, 765 F.3d 1096 (9th Cir. August 29, 2014), aff’g, In re Schwartz-Tallard, 473 B.R. 340 (B.A.P. 9th Cir. 2012). The court distinguished Sternberg v. Johnston, 595 F.3d 937 (9th Cir. 2010), which held that a debtor’s attorneys’ fees for work on an adversary proceeding seeking damages for a stay violation were not actual damages and thus were not recoverable under 11 U.S.C. § 362(k)(1). In this case, ASC’s appeal challenged both the fee award and the substantive stay violation ruling, therefore, the debtor’s fees were incurred in defending both the damage award and the finding of stay violation.
Oral argument is scheduled for the week of March 16, 2015, though debtor’s counsel has asked for a new date.
College Students Underestimate Their Student Loan Debt
Based on a study using data drawn from two sources linking student survey responses to administrative records on cost and borrowing, a Brookings Institution report has concluded that “a significant share of undergraduate students do not understand how much they are paying for college or how much debt they are taking on.” The report indicated that 28% of college freshmen who have taken out federal student loans, do not think they have any federal debt, and 14% do not realize that they have any debt at all. Not only does a large percentage of students fail to grasp the extent or nature of their loans, but only a bare majority of college freshmen (52%) could estimate their actual costs of college within $5,000 accuracy. The report concludes: “It is possible, even likely, that this lack of knowledge will cause students to be surprised when their financial circumstances become apparent, perhaps when their first loan payment comes due. This surprise, or even fear, may impose an emotional burden on borrowers. More broadly, it may contribute to popular narratives about crushing student loan burdens, which are inconsistent with the reality that these burdens remain manageable for most borrowers (Akers and Chingos 2014).”