Creditor Estopped from Objecting to Amended Plan

Posted by NCBRC - February 21st, 2023

A mortgage creditor who accepted the debtor’s plan could not late object to confirmation of an amended plan that contained the same terms with respect to that creditor. In re Ritter, No. 22-40120 (Bankr. S.D. Ill. Feb. 2, 2023). Read More

Who Would Win in a Fight, Allowed Claim or Confirmed Plan?

Posted by NCBRC - December 9th, 2022

The winner? Confirmed plan. Where the mortgagee had notice and opportunity to object to confirmation of the debtors’ chapter 13 plan providing for mortgage arrears in the amount of approximately half the mortgagee’s allowed proof of claim, the mortgagee could not be heard, at the debtors’ successful completion of their plan, to complain that the debtors still owed pre-petition arrears. In re Edelstein, No. 17-11461 (Bankr. N.D. Ill. Nov. 7, 2022). Read More

Ovation Denied Keys to the Candy Store

Posted by NCBRC - November 17th, 2022

A bankruptcy court rejected the tax lender’s challenge to the district’s Mandatory Form Chapter 13 Plan where it found the lender, whose claim would be fully paid through that plan, simply did “not want this Court’s oversight in approving claims for reimbursement for any post-petition expense charges.” In re Martin, No. 22-30148 (Bankr. S.D. Tex. Nov. 14, 2022). Read More

Pawn Contract Disavowing Bankruptcy Intent Is Enforceable

Posted by NCBRC - November 14th, 2022

A pawn agreement requiring the borrower to affirm that she was not in bankruptcy and did not intend to file for bankruptcy was not unenforceable as against public policy because the agreement did not commit the borrower to an agreement not to file for bankruptcy at a later date. TitleMax v. Roby, No. 21-630 (M.D. Ala. Sept. 19, 2022). Read More

Plan’s Discriminatory Treatment of Student Lender not Unfair

Posted by NCBRC - November 3rd, 2022

Two chapter 13 plans providing for maintenance of the debtors’ student loans outside the plan satisfied section 1325(b)(1)(A)’s requirement that claims be paid at 100%, and did not unfairly discriminate against the class of student lenders even though they would receive smaller monthly payments than other unsecured claims and not be fully paid at the end of the plan. In re Durand-Day, No.22-40089 (Bankr. N.D. Tex. Oct. 26, 2022). Read More

Sorry, Can’t Confirm Plan If You’re Dead

Posted by NCBRC - August 23rd, 2022

A debtor who has shuffled off this mortal coil cannot confirm a chapter 13 plan where he has no ability to fund it with future income and no need for the fresh start offered by bankruptcy discharge. In re Carrasco, No. 21-51420 (Bankr. W.D. Tex. July 19, 2022).

In this case, the debtor died after the meeting of the creditors, but before his proposed chapter 13 plan had been confirmed. The debtor’s counsel lobbied to substitute the debtor’s son to confirm the plan notwithstanding the fact that the debtor himself had ridden the carriage into immortality. The trustee objected to confirmation. Read More

Creditor Could Not Object to Modification that Did Not Change Treatment of its Loan

Posted by NCBRC - July 8th, 2022

A creditor that fails to object to treatment of its loan in the debtor’s proposed chapter 13 plan cannot object to modification of that plan where the modification did not change treatment of its loan. In re Powell, No. 21-3069 (Bankr. D.S.C May 16, 2022). Read More

Divorcing Debtor’s Plan Proposed in Good Faith

Posted by NCBRC - June 8th, 2022

The below-median debtor was entitled to confirmation of his chapter 13 plan where he proposed his plan in good faith and committed all of his disposable income to it despite the fact that he was in the middle of a divorce and his income and expenses were in a state of flux. In re Szafraniec, No. 21-10216 (Bankr. N.D. Ill. May 27, 2022). Read More

Chapter 11 Debtor’s Amendment to File under SBRA Would Prejudice Creditor

Posted by NCBRC - May 16th, 2022

The debtor’s proposed amendment to file her chapter 11 petition under the newly enacted SBRA under which only the debtor could have a plan confirmed, would unduly prejudice the mortgage creditor who expended a great deal of time, expense, and effort to negotiate and obtain approval of its own plan. Ventura v. Gregory Funding, No. 20-1949 (E.D.N.Y. April 21, 2022). Read More

Provision for Balloon Payment after Sale Precludes Confirmation

Posted by NCBRC - April 15th, 2022

In a consolidated opinion, the Bankruptcy Court for the District of Massachusetts held that the “equal payment provision of § 1325(a)(5)(B)(iii) is best read to prohibit confirmation of a sale plan, over the objection of a secured creditor holding a mortgage of a principal residence, that contemplates periodic payments followed by a lump-sum payment.” In re Materne, No. 20-40027, and In re Gnaman, No. 19-40930 (Bankr. D. Mass. April 7, 2022). Read More

Tag Archive: Plan confirmation