Author Archives: NCBRC

Lac du Flambeau Band of Lake Superior Chippewa Indians v. Coughlin, No. 22-227 (S.Ct.)

Type: Amicus Date: March 31, 2023 Description: Whether the Bankruptcy Code abrogates tribal sovereign immunity. Result: Pending Coughlin NACBA Amicus SCt March 2023

Too Little, Too Late in Motion to Reopen

The bankruptcy court did not abuse its discretion in declining to reopen the debtor’s case sixteen years after its closure to administer an asset the debtor did not own until after his bankruptcy case closed. Gamez v. Lopez (In re Lopez), No. 22-2379 (E.D.N.Y. March 9, 2023).

Four Strikes and Yer Out

The debtor could not gain traction on any of the four appeals of bankruptcy court orders which approved two settlements negotiated by the trustee, limited his exemption, and overruled his motion to dismiss, where the district court found that the bankruptcy judge considered the appropriate factors and did not abuse her discretion. Delaney v. Messer […]

“Equity Abhors a Forfeiture”

Where the debtor had paid over 70% of the purchase price of real property, the court found that equitable principles precluded granting relief from stay to allow the seller to enforce a provision in the sales documents requiring the defaulting debtor to “forfeit not only the property, but all deposits, improvements and payments made.” Allied […]

Debtor Misled Lender as to Discharge of Debt

The debtor’s own conduct gave the lender reason to believe that the debt owed to him was not discharged, so the bankruptcy court did not err in finding that the lender’s continued collection efforts lacked the requisite scienter to support a contempt sanction for violation of the discharge injunction. Bernhard v. Kull (In re Bernhard), […]

Lac du Flambeau v. Coughlin, No. 22-227 (SCt)

Type: Amicus Date: March 31, 2023 Description: Whether the Bankruptcy Code abrogates tribal sovereign immunity. Result: Pending Coughlin NACBA Amicus SCt March 2023

Sixth Circuit Questions “Person-Aggrieved” Standard for Appeal

The debtors’ claim against lenders for charging improper fees during their bankruptcy belonged to the bankruptcy estate, but the lenders’ appeal of the bankruptcy court’s order of abandonment was dismissed because they lacked a direct financial stake in the outcome of the bankruptcy court’s decision and, therefore were not “persons-aggrieved.” In so holding, the Sixth […]

Tax Sale Survives Multiple Attacks

The bankruptcy court applied the proper standard for determining “reasonably equivalent value” in the tax sale of the debtor’s home where it used a hypothetical foreclosure sale as the comparator rather than the fair market value. The Rooker-Feldman doctrine prevented the bankruptcy court from nullifying the sale despite procedural irregularities. And even where the debtor […]

“Sham” Carve-Out Agreement Rejected

Calling the agreement a “sham,” the district court affirmed the bankruptcy court’s denial of a carve-out agreement between the chapter 7 trustee and the state and federal tax creditors. The court found the agreement would adhere to no one’s benefit but their own. The court also upheld the bankruptcy court’s finding that the debtor’s homestead […]

Punitive Damages for Stay Violation Were Excessive

The punitive damages awarded by the bankruptcy court were unconstitutionally excessive where they were seven times greater than actual damages and the bankruptcy court increased the damages on remand because it found the lender’s success at the BAP level would eliminate a substantial disincentive to engage in the conduct establishing the automatic stay violation. Rushmore […]