A chapter 13 debtor’s post-petition contributions to his qualified retirement account may be deducted from the calculation of his projected disposable income and the amount of those contributions is presumed to be the average contribution made during the six months preceding bankruptcy. Where, as here, the debtor substantially increased his contributions on the eve of bankruptcy, he bears the burden of proving that his projected disposable income calculation should be reduced by the increased retirement account contributions. In re Huston, 2021 WL 4528883 (Bankr. N.D. Ill. Sept. 30, 2021) (case no. 20-81689). [Read more…] about Pre-Petition Increase in Retirement Account Contributions
Fraudulent Transfer Claim Precluded by Discharge Injunction
Because an action for fraudulent transfer is not merely a collection action, the creditors were precluded by the discharge injunction from pursuing their state court appeal of that action even though the predicate debt was found to be nondischargeable in the debtor’s bankruptcy. SuVicMon Dev. Inc. v. Morrison, No. 20-11681 (11th Cir. March 25, 2021). [Read more…] about Fraudulent Transfer Claim Precluded by Discharge Injunction
Scotus: Three Denials and a Pending
The Supreme Court recently denied cert petitions in three bankruptcy-related cases: Hull v. Rockwell, No. 20-499 (pet’n denied Feb. 22, 2021); GE Capital Retail Bank v. Belton, 20-481 (pet’n denied March 8, 2021); and Marino v. Ocwen Loan Servicing, No. 20-409 (pet’n denied March 22, 2021). [Read more…] about Scotus: Three Denials and a Pending
Tuition Payments for Adult Daughter Subject to Claw Back
The chapter 7 trustee could use his strong-arm powers to “claw back” tuition payments the debtors had made for their adult daughter’s education. DeGiacomo v. Sacred Heart University, Inc. (In re Palladino), No. 17-1334 (1st Cir. Nov. 12, 2019).
Steven and Lori Palladino made college tuition payments for their adult daughter within two years of filing for chapter 7 bankruptcy. The bankruptcy trustee filed an adversary proceeding against Sacred Heart University seeking to recover almost $65,000 in tuition payments. Both the trustee and Sacred Heart filed motions for summary judgment and the bankruptcy court granted judgment to Sacred Heart. The First Circuit granted direct appeal. [Read more…] about Tuition Payments for Adult Daughter Subject to Claw Back
Proceeds from Sale of Fraudulently Transferred Property May Be Recovered from Third Party
The chapter 7 trustee may “recover money from the entity who received the proceeds from the sale of fraudulently transferred property, but to whom the property itself was never transferred.” Rajala v. Husch Blackwell LLP, No. 08-20957, Adv. Proc. No. 18-6016; Rajala v. Spencer Fane LLP, Adv. Proc. No. 18-6020 (Bankr. D. Kans. Aug. 14, 2019).
Three couples started GRHC, a company designed to explore the possibilities of wind-generated electricity. GRHC initiated a wind-energy project in Pennsylvania called Lookout Windpower. The three couples then created the Lookout Windpower Holding Company (LWHC) and transferred Lookout Windpower from GRHC to LWHC rendering GRHC insolvent. LWHC then sold Lookout Windpower to Edison Mission Energy for over $6.7 million, and GRHC filed for chapter 7 bankruptcy. From the Lookout Windpower sale proceeds, LWHC paid the law firms of Husch Blackwell over $1.3 million and Spencer Fane over $700,000. The trustee in GRHC’s bankruptcy case successfully avoided the transfer of Lookout Windpower from GRHC to LWHC and sought to recover the funds paid to the law firms out of the proceeds from LWHC’s subsequent sale of the property. The law firms moved to dismiss the adversary complaints.
[Read more…] about Proceeds from Sale of Fraudulently Transferred Property May Be Recovered from Third PartyPayment of Pre-Petition Debt by Debtor’s Mother Is Preferential Transfer
In what the panel called a strained application of a legal fiction, the BAP for the Tenth Circuit found that money paid by the chapter 7 debtor’s mother directly to one of the debtor’s creditors was a preferential transfer where it preceded the bankruptcy by fewer than 90 days, was secured by a promissory note by the debtor, and favored one creditor over the debtor’s other creditors. Stevens, Littman, Biddison, Tharp and Weinberg, LLC. v. Walters (In re Wagenknecht), 2019 WL 2353534 (B.A.P. 10th Cir. June 4, 2019) (case no. 18-93).
[Read more…] about Payment of Pre-Petition Debt by Debtor’s Mother Is Preferential TransferDebtor’s Chapter 7 Fails 707(b)’s “Smell Test”
Sara Lianne Hamilton-Conversano filed for Chapter 7 bankruptcy with the sole purpose of dealing with a $46,669.52 credit card debt on a credit card she and her non-filing spouse used to pay all household expenses. Finding that Ms. Hamilton-Conversano underreported contributions from her non-filing spouse on her Statement of Current Monthly Income, Form 122A-1, and took too large a deduction for private school tuition on Form 122A-2, the court granted the Bankruptcy Administrator’s motion to dismiss for abuse under section 707(b)(1). In re Hamilton-Conversano, No. 17-128 (Bankr. E.D. N.C. Sept. 28, 2017). [Read more…] about Debtor’s Chapter 7 Fails 707(b)’s “Smell Test”
Loan Paid Directly from Dept. of Educ. to Penn State Not a Fraudulent Transfer
A Parent Plus loan made directly from the Department of Education to Penn State University before the debtor’s bankruptcy filing is not a fraudulent transfer where the funds were never in the debtor’s possession and would not have been available to his creditors. Eisenberg v. Pennsylvania State Univ. (In re Lewis), No. 16-12372, Adv. Proc. Nos. 16-0282, 16-0284 (Bankr. E.D. Pa. April 7, 2017). [Read more…] about Loan Paid Directly from Dept. of Educ. to Penn State Not a Fraudulent Transfer
FTC Cracking Down on Dishonest Payday Lenders
The FTC has been going after fraudulent payday lending operations centered in Missouri and Kansas, with settlements as high as $1.266 billion.
In a press release dated January 9, 2017, the FTC announced charges against businessman, Joel Jerome Tucker, and his companies, SQ Capital LLC, JT Holding Inc., and HPD LLC, for selling portfolios made up of fake payday loans. According to the FTC, the loans listed in the portfolios were named phony lenders and debtors, including their social security and bank account numbers, and led to collection activities against consumers who had not taken out loans. The FTC previously brought actions against two debt collectors who used the fake portfolios.
In October 2016, the Kansas City Star reported that Joel Tucker’s brother, Missouri businessman and sometime racecar driver, Scott Tucker, was ordered to pay $1.266 billion to the FTC after Nevada federal judge, Gloria Navarro, determined that he and others ran a payday loan enterprise that engaged in deceit against its customers by failing to disclose terms and conditions of the loans and for charging usurious interest rates. Judge Navarro called the fraud “sustained and continuous.” Mr. Tucker attempted to evade state lending regulations by locating portions of his businesses on tribal lands, though the bulk of his operations were located in Overland Park, Kansas. Scott Tucker also has a pending criminal case against him in which he is accused of running a $2 billion payday loan enterprise that defrauded 4.5 million consumers. That case is scheduled for trial in April 2017.
In another case, a settlement was reached last summer between the FTC and payday lenders, Tim Coppinger and Ted Rowland, and their companies. Under the terms of that agreement the lenders paid almost $1 million with the threat of substantially greater judgments (up to $32 million) should they fail to honor the terms of the settlement agreement. The fraudulent activity included debiting money from the accounts of people who never requested loans but for whom the payday lender had obtained personal information. They would then charge interest and fees on those unauthorized loans. Joel Tucker had a hand in this operation through his company, eData Solutions, a “one-stop-shop” for assisting payday lenders in their start-ups and operations. eData’s involvement consisted of providing “customer/borrower leads, qualifying the leads, providing a loan management software system, and buying defaulted consumer loans to sell to third-party collectors.” Court-appointed Receiver, Larry Cook, is seeking to recover the entire $29.9 million that Coppinger and Rowland’s companies paid to eData Solutions for its services.
Smith v. SIPI, LLC, No. 15-1166 (7th Cir.)
Type: Amicus
Date: May 7, 2015
Description: Whether Chapter 13 debtors received reasonably equivalent value for property sold at a tax sale conducted in accordance with Illinois law, so that sale was not avoidable under 548(a)(1)(B) as a constructively fraudulent transfer.
Result: District court judgment reversed, bankruptcy court judgment affirmed, January 20, 2016.