Experian Not Required under FCRA to Know Legal Validity of Debt

Posted by NCBRC - January 11th, 2023

Where it was not clear whether the debtor’s educational loan was included in his discharge, Experian did not violate the FCRA by reporting it as an outstanding debt. Mader v. Experian Information Solutions, Inc., No. 20-3073 (2d Cir. Jan. 4, 2023). Read More

Non-Debtor Spouse Transfers Interest to Debtor Post-Discharge

Posted by NCBRC - January 5th, 2023

The debtor’s adversary complaint stated a claim under sections 522 and 524 against a creditor who pursued state court action to avoid the transfer of community property from the non-debtor spouse to the debtor after the debtor had obtained discharge of the creditor’s claim. Rhodes v. Pecanland Village Shopping Center, LLC., No. 19-31559, Adv. Proc. No. 22-3010 (Bankr. W.D. La. Dec. 14, 2022). Read More

Removal of Trust Contingency Benefits Estate

Posted by NCBRC - January 2nd, 2023

Removal of a contingency in a Trust did not create a new asset such that the resulting increase in value to the debtor/beneficiary would be considered a post-petition asset. In re Wright, No. 19-21544 (Bankr. D. Kans. Dec. 7, 2022).

The Wrights filed for chapter 13 bankruptcy with unsecured debts totaling $14,196.53. They confirmed a three-year plan that provided little to no distribution to unsecured creditors. When they filed for bankruptcy, Ms. Wright and her siblings were the beneficiaries of an irrevocable Trust consisting of 40 acres of real property. The Trust had a contingency that one of Ms. Wright’s siblings, Ronnie True, would receive the Trust income and continue to live on the Trust property for the remainder of his life. Upon Mr. True’s death, the Trustee could then either deed or sell the property for the benefit of the remaining siblings, including Ms. Wright. Read More

IRA Withdrawals Create Regular Income for 109(e) Purposes

Posted by NCBRC - December 30th, 2022

The debtor had “income” for purposes of eligibility to be a chapter 13 debtor where he intended to use regular withdrawals from his IRA to fund his plan. In re Frysinger, No. 20-31202 (Bankr. D. Ore. Dec. 21, 2022).

The debtor created a plan which he proposed to fund through: 1) holdings in bank account consisting of funds he received pre-petition from settlement of a personal injury lawsuit, 2) future sales of property, and 3) IRA withdrawals. The case came before the court on a creditor’s challenge to the debtor’s status as a bankruptcy debtor under section 109(e). Read More

Wells Fargo and False Loan Forbearance Class Action

Posted by NCBRC - December 20th, 2022

The court denied a motion to dismiss the debtors’ class action adversary complaint against Wells Fargo based on Wells Fargo’s inaccurate notices to various bankruptcy courts that the debtors’ loans had been placed in COVID forbearance at the debtors’ request. Harlow v. Wells Fargo & Co., No. 17-71487, Adv. Proc. No. 20-7028 (Bankr. W.D. Dec. 12, 2022). Read More

Unemployment Overpayment Not a Priority Tax Debt

Posted by NCBRC - December 13th, 2022

Kentucky’s Office of Unemployment Insurance’s claim for an overpayment of unemployment compensation benefits was not entitled to priority in the debtor’s chapter 13 case where the nature of the claim was better characterized as a “penalty” than a “tax.” In re Clardy, No. 22-30089 (Bankr. W.D. Ky. Dec. 1, 2022). Read More

Who Would Win in a Fight, Allowed Claim or Confirmed Plan?

Posted by NCBRC - December 9th, 2022

The winner? Confirmed plan. Where the mortgagee had notice and opportunity to object to confirmation of the debtors’ chapter 13 plan providing for mortgage arrears in the amount of approximately half the mortgagee’s allowed proof of claim, the mortgagee could not be heard, at the debtors’ successful completion of their plan, to complain that the debtors still owed pre-petition arrears. In re Edelstein, No. 17-11461 (Bankr. N.D. Ill. Nov. 7, 2022). Read More

Post-Petition Fee Agreement a No-Go

Posted by NCBRC - December 7th, 2022

A fee agreement that purports to attach an attorney’s lien on the debtor’s exempt personal property is unenforceable under section 526(a) where state law allows such liens only on non-exempt property or on exempt personal property for specified exceptions not including attorney’s fees. In re Turner, No. 22-41570 (Bankr. D. Minn. Dec. 2, 2022). Read More

First Circuit Dodges Late-Filed Tax Return Issues

Posted by NCBRC - December 2nd, 2022

Faced with the question of whether the debtor’s tax debt based on a late-filed tax return was excepted from discharge, the circuit declined to reexamine its holding in Fahey where it applied the strict “one day late” rule, found the debtor waived his argument in support of an objective test that does not consider timing of filing, and instead, held the debtor’s late-filed tax return did not meet Beard’s subjective test for a “return.” In re Kriss, 21-1206 (1st Cir. Nov. 22, 2022). Read More

Exemption Amount in Lien Avoidance Action

Posted by NCBRC - November 30th, 2022

For purposes of lien avoidance under section 522(f), the debtor was able to claim a homestead exemption in the amount of the California exemption in effect at the time of his bankruptcy petition, despite California law that fixed the exemption amount at the time of lien creation. Barclay v. Boskoski (In re Boskoski), No. 22-55098 (9th Cir. Nov. 14, 2022). Read More